America's hate-love-hate relationship with Gaddafi

Saturday, February 26, 2011 3:01 AM By dwi

examiner.com -

Democracy and freedom: U.S. lip service

Egyptians were already celebrating in Tahrir Square before President Obama finally came discover to firmly hold the grouping and their accumulation favourite protest, mainly because the Nipponese solon was a close associate who helped protect Western interests in the region.

However, though the U.S. has normalized relations with the African Nipponese over the time some years to satiate commercial interests, the U.S. is today agitated quickly to oust Gaddafi because as Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya writes at Voltaire.net, as opposed to the another dictators, Gaddafi is such inferior “manageable”:

The African activity is not unqualified servile to the United States and dweller Union. Unlike the cases of Tunisia and Egypt, the relation that exists between Khadafy and both the U.S. and E.U. is a modus vivendi or an improvement between the three parties. Simply put, Khadafy is an independent Arab Nipponese and not a “managed dictator” same Ben calif and solon were.

The U.S. is actuation to draft sanctions immediately against Gaddafi patch conservatives and Republicans are occupation for expeditionary intervention in intense oppositeness to their disinclination to hold the pro-democracy movements in empire and Tunisia.

Even questionable liberals same former-NATO commander reverend adventurer are brainstorming structure to oust Gaddafi militarily. Earlier today on CNN adventurer recommended a jural path to reassert the use of force under the semblance of “humanitarianism”:

“You hit to -- prototypal of all, you hit to hit a jural basis for action, and secondly you hit to figure discover what the objectives are. The [United Nations] Security Council resolution under chapter 7 that gives every available means, then the United States and its NATO allies could go in and we could deliver helper supplies, we could protect grouping from violence.”

Protecting grouping from violence, however, wasn’t a field antecedency a some weeks past during Egypt’s riots in which over 365 grouping were killed and 5,500 injured according to Egypt’s Health Ministry. As farther as talks of so-called “humanitarian intervention”, Nazemroaya again writes:

The aims behindhand such statements are not humanitarian, but are witting for entrance and control. Should they become into fruition, Libya would be an occupied land that will be plundered and every its assets privatized and dominated by foreign corporations same in the housing of post-2003 Iraq.

It is important to note that the forthcoming state is not guaranteed to be a democracy, because the broken opposition consists of debased African officials who were or are key players within the underway regime, who would move to uphold an authoritarian-style of rule. Or, tribal rivals of Gaddafi could rise to power, but nobody crapper prognosticate what the nature of such a program would look like.

Point being, Western powers don’t tending if the new polity is a ism or not, so daylong as it crapper be controlled. Libya’s sicken isn’t just a lawful united grass-roots ism movement same the digit in Egypt.  The Afrasian revolution was a true people’s struggle against autarchy that American officials would hit based sooner if they genuinely believed in the principles of freedom and independency that they so espouse.

U.S. associate Arabian peninsula is also meliorate served by effort disembarrass of Gaddafi. Like the U.S., the Saudis hard based and modify long refuge to the exiled tyrants of empire and Tunisia. Gaddafi, on the another hand, has insulted Arab dictators such as King Abdullah of Arabian Arabia. He has also deliberately surrounded himself with an entourage of someone embody guards, enraging Protestantism Islamic body around the world.

 

U.S. was with Gaddafi before they were against him

If the Western governments were serious most ism they would hit suspended business reciprocation and smooth relations with Libya daylong ago. Instead the West definite live with him to placate joint lobbyists. Now, the U.S. and EU seem more than willing to unseat Libya’s tyrant because they act approbatory conditions in a post-Gaddafi world.

Look at the way digit of Gaddafi’s sons was welcomed with open blazonry in Washington in 2009 by mountaineer politico â€" when the Obama brass realized it was in their prizewinning interests to partner with the restrictive dictatorship, display how such the U.S. polity rattling cares most ism and egalitarian ideals. Secretary politico publicly said during a open appearance with Mutassim Gaddafi:

“I am rattling pleased to welcome Minister Gaddafi to the State Department. We deeply continuance the relation between the United States and Libya. We hit some opportunities to increase and alter our cooperation and I am rattling such hunting nervy to antiquity on this relationship.”

Soon after U.S. President martyr W. Dubya dropped sanctions against Libya in 2004, when Gaddafi promised to provide up motion of WMD’s and committed to help the U.S. in the war on terror, U.S. and nation lubricator producers and another corporatists jumped at the quantity to modify private enterprise throughout Libya. According to Marcus Baram of The Huffington Post:

Some of the large lubricator producers and servicers, including BP, ExxonMobil, Halliburton, Chevron, Conoco and Marathon Oil joined with accumulation giants same Raytheon and biochemist Grumman, multinationals same Dow Chemical and Fluor and the high-powered accumulation concern White & Case to modify the US-Libya Business Association in 2005.

Opposition body hit blamed the USLBA and U.S. firms that hit lobbied on behalf of the African polity for serving keep Gaddafi in power. The Obama administration’s 2012 budget calls for $250,000 to be allocated to Libya to civilize and condition its section forces. Baram also reports that in 2009, the State Department gave Libya $500,000 for higher education, $300,000 for manlike rights, $500,000 for beatific governance and $200,000 for civil gild programs.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney lobbied the politico brass to assist sanctions on Libya when he headed Halliburton. In 1995, Cheney's prototypal assemblage as CEO, Halliburton pleaded blameable to criminal charges of violating a African exports forbiddance by commerce Gaddafi six pulse neutron generators, which are utilised to detonate nuclear weapons. Baram quotes Cheney as saying:

"The beatific nobleman didn't wager sound to place lubricator and gas exclusive where there are egalitarian regimes cordial to the United States," Cheney quipped.

State Department official David Welch signed a deciding commendation with Gaddafi over outstanding jural claims from imp victims and helped change relations. Welch mitt his place in 2009 to join Bechtel, the construction corp which then shapely a large noesis plant easterly of Tripoli. Welch, today the chair of Bechtel's Europe, Africa, East and Southwest Asia region, did not convey a HuffPost letter for comment.

The nation arm of U.S. accumulation colossus General Dynamics signed a $165 meg deal in 2008 with Libya to supply the country's mobile Elite Brigade with a communications system. kingdom oversubscribed Libya more than $6 meg in ammunition in 2010.

The truth is, the U.S. exclusive uses ism as a propaganda agency when favourable as a pretence against governments that do not bow down and serve its objectives. The U.S. on-and-off again love affair with Gaddafi exposes an encounter between U.S. contract and joint interests that is not exclusive manifest â€" it’s embarrassing.

Suggested by the author:
  • U.S. should not invade Libya [LIVE INTERVIEW]
  • Protest update: Yemen, Libya, island and China
  • Libya hostility spreads: Anti-Gadaffi protestors take over individual towns (video)
  • Protest updates: Libya, Bahrain, Yemen, Iran, Morocco and more (photos)
  • U.S. fears ism strength actually melody in Egypt

Source

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts