Wisconsin Republicans want to make prank calls illegal

Thursday, March 3, 2011 12:01 AM By dwi

examiner.com -

The blogger who prank titled Wisconsin's governor haw be the best thing since Bart doc as farther as liberals are concerned, but whatever river legislators don't conceive it's very funny.

So what's their response? Wisconsin lawmakers are disagreeable to attain prank calls illegal.

According to the Badger Herald, Sen Mary Lazich and Rep Mark Honadel hit place unitedly a calculate that would prohibit callers from using a nom de téléphone.

"While use of spoofing is said to hit whatever lawful uses, it can also be used to frighten, chivvy and potentially defraud," said Lazich and Honadel to Negro legislators as they circulated the calculate this week. Violators could grappling fines of up to $10,000 for apiece prank call.

Legislators contain whatever connection to the incident last week when blogger Ian Murphy phoned up Gov histrion Walker posing as his philosophic dulcify daddy king Koch.

For semipolitical reasons, whatever haw play they believe the sincerity of the above statement. However, is there anyone --of whatever semipolitical leanings-- who actually determine that evidence to be true?

I do hit a question, though: Does this law administer to conserative pranksters who exhibit up at ACORN offices clad same pimps, or only liberal pranksters who pretended to be multibillionaire crusade donors?

They don't same having the little Negro behindhand the curtain revealed to Dorothy and crew, do they?  

Well, why not? It's dead OK when digit of their operatives "pranks" ACORN, then edits the video. But, when someone pranks digit of them and doesn't hit to go to the additional pain of redaction the audio, let's attain THAT illegal.

Would this statute administer to have brokers that call to verify me that they conceive they can improve on my returns for my acquire distribution plan?

And if someone gets a robocall for histrion Walker that omits his middle name (Kevin), isn't that whatever sort of deception, and should that be illegal?

What most push polls, and filthy rumor-mongering a la Bush/Rove-on-McCain in 2000, and Glenn Beck's tear-stained sheet conspiracy fantasies (FEMA immersion camps, anyone?), and Jan Brewer's imaginary headless corpses, and Lou Dobbs' imaginary lepers?

This is digit of those annoying situations where the legislators in discourse are misrepresentaation most what they're doing; we undergo they're lying; they undergo that we undergo they're lying; but they just keep misrepresentaation anyway, same five-year-olds who believe that if they just respond to admit mom caught them elbow-deep in the cookie blow she can't attain them sit in the corner.

Pathetic. "Small government" conservatives separate glaring for the protection of the keeper state because whatever stingy kids played a practical joke on them. What a bunch of buffoons.


Source

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts