Rumsfeld compares Afghanistan to the Cold War (video)

Monday, February 21, 2011 3:01 AM By dwi

examiner.com -

On Sunday’s “State of the Union” information on CNN, Candy Crowley speaks to the former Defense Secretary most the struggle in Afghanistan where Mr. Rumsfeld makes a reference to scrutiny our occupation in that land to the decades daylong Cold War.

At around the 1:34 mark in the video, Crowley asks Rumsfeld if he thinks we’ll still be in Afghanistan 10 eld from now. He responds by locution that we can’t attain a occupation discover of it.

Did you hear most the Nadler amendment to modify the war?

Crowley apace rebuts him locution that we are making a occupation discover of it. Remember, it’s already been 10 eld and the administration is today conversation 2014!

Rumsfeld responds by locution that Crowley is correct if you compare it to World War I or II, where the wars start and end. Yes, you stingy wars that were proclaimed by the Congress, where you fisticuffs the enemy, get and get out, yes.

Is this guy a belligerent of the Constitution? CPAC thinks so

He then makes the denial that if you conceive most it like the Cold War, where it lasted 30-40 eld (now you’re scaring me). He states that the struggle in Afghanistan is not a customary struggle with armies, navies and air forces, “we hit whatever troops”, but it’s not feat to be won by bullets but by ideas.  

Let’s see: “some troops”= 100,000 American men and women.

It’s not feat to be won by bullets, but by ideas: then ground do we hit armed soldiers in that country?

Crowley responds saying, “We’re still in the bullet phase 10 eld later”.

Rumsfeld decided to go after Saddam just hours into 9/11

Rumsfeld responds:

“Of instruction we are, to whatever extent. We haven’t forfeited a battle; we can’t lose a battle in cost of a military battle. That means something added is feat on. What’s feat on, we’re feat to hit to work the concern that these people (the Taliban) are harmful, they’re dangerous, and they’re against the nation-state concept.”

That’s our responsibility? That’s what our men and women are dying for? Don’t you just love Rumsfeld-speak?

Suggested by the author:
  • A some text with Antiwar.com editorialist prince Giraldi
  • Chaos and hostility in the Middle East and North Africa
  • Gretchen Carlson thinks we should disregard the Constitution (video)
  • Freedom for all, unless you're Wikileaks or Ray McGovern (video)
  • Secretaries parliamentarian enterpriser and mountaineer politico critical of planned party cuts

Source

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts